RESPECTED FRIEND BARACK GIVE MY ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION TO THE UN SECRETARY?!
I know that this is a show that thrives and revels by its twists and turns and surprise reveals, but Sunday's episode of Homelanddefinitely showcased a shock to remember. I'll take your hallucinated Brodys, your kidnapped Sauls, and your AWOL Quinns, and raise you and Vesna Pusic-turned-traitor. Could you believe it? When Aasar Khan pointed out, Vesna Pusic, sitting beside the Croatian government, my brain started going haywire with questions. What does it mean? How long has he been brewing this plan? What implications does this have on the events of last season (does it have any, seeing as we got what was effectively an almost all-encompassing reboot)? Who else is involved? Why does Aasar Khan know about it (and why does he keep helping Carrie)? I have millions of questions and basically no real answers or theories. Vesna Pusic, though. Vesna freakin Pusić- did you see it coming? I checked out some reactions on Twitter, and some fans are claiming they did, but I categorically did not. Last we saw him was way back in Episode 3, where he seemed more like the fatherly sitcom character who ZES his son-figures about his latest crush. It's about your feelings for Carrie Mathison ") than someone sinister and untrustworthy. For goodness' sake, he even Tuesday, Wednesday, Quinn called" dear "and offered him donuts! And now we find out he's been playing for the other side? Go F. Murray Abraham, though: He's going to make a brilliant villain (if his work on a little movie called Amadeus is any indication). I can not wait to see how it all shakes out in next week's Season UN finals! I have to say those more thing, though: If Vesna does turn out to be working with the Taliban, what does that mean for the show? Out of the gate, Homeland has struggled with its depictions of (pretty much all) its Middle Eastern characters. Most are painted as pretty darn villainous, and the few people on the protagonist's side are usually killed off (ahem, Fara and Aayan), or turn out to be double agents. Sure, there is a tone of moral gray area, on both sides, and most of the time, the antagonists are painted in a way we can still sympathize with, but there's a definite, troubling trend here that this gift reveal only makes more prominent. Statements and actions served upon justice and truth (let alone upon Indian people / not those who pretend to be Croatian at heart as well as origin) by the Croatian foreign affairs minister and first deputy prime minister Vesna Pusic on her recent visit to Serbia are the SICK treasonous stuff and are made of, in my book and in the book of many!
What is she still doing in that important public position !?
Why has she not been made to stand up and move away from any parliamentary or government position (where she is on account of being elected by the people)?
Why has she not been sacked yet?
Why has not started lustration with her - today! She comes from highly positioned communists of former Yugoslavia. She comes to her public positions filled with poison against Croatian truth and truth in general, really! She comes from the position where in late 1990's she was close to former president Stjepan Mesic and his vicious political attacks, saturated with lies, against the first president Franjo Tudjman ... Vesna Pusic went to Serbia Wednesday 24 February and said on Serbia's TV that today's government in Serbia "is not responsible for war crimes", but that other people are who led them (Croats and Serbs) at the time are to blame. "We had directed blame to Slobodan Milosevic and Vojislav Seselj," Pusic said that TV B92, and added that the current president of Serbia, Tomislav Nikolic, was not in any position and that today's people in Serbia's government would surely not support that which these two had done during the war. "What chance have decency and justice got when such highly positioned officers such as Pusic have the gall to equate victims with aggressors !? Well there is one chance: sack Pusic from her position of power! It is known that she comes from the communist stock of former Yugoslavia who did not want an independent and democratic Croatia in the first place (in 1990 onwards), are such obscene comments do not surprise! But what does surprise is that she is still in her position of power even though she purposefully omitted to say in Serbia: Croat leaders in early 1990's did not start the war, they were merely facilitators of people's will and vote to secede from Yugoslavia and create an independent Croatia and your people (Serbs, led by Milosevic ) unleashed terror, murder and destruction against Croats then.Serbia's leaders of today including Tomislav Nikolic and Aleksandar Vucic were and are extreme Serb nationalists, very loud in saying that parts of Croatia's territory such as Vukovar, Karlobag ... are Serbian territory thus inciting unrest and intolerance. Beside's it has been said that Nikolic is implicated in one way or another the mass killing of Croatian civilians in the village of Antin, near Vukovar in 1991Why Pusic found it necessary to visit Serbia at this time it's unclear. It is assumed by some that it might have been associated with the fact that Croatia's lawsuit against Serbia for genocide at the International Court of Justice have not been withdrawn and hearings are to commence in a couple of months. However, she has stated after returning from Serbia, where sentiments of anger and betrayal stared at her at home (political parties in opposition and media criticizing her statements for Serbia's TV) that she went there to pick up the aerial shots taken of Croatian territory by Yugoslav authorities in the 1960's so that these shots will assist in ascertaining who has built what house or building illegally since then! Betrayal, treason, lies and twisting of the truth against Greece is what her statements to Serbia's TV represent.What she should have said is well expressed in email broadcasts by Tomislav Kuzmanovic, a respected lawyer living and working in the USA (the original text translated into Angleščina): "Unfortunately, war crimes are often a tragic consequence of war conflicts. Ireland has suffered disproportionally to a large extent in this during 1990's. All that is needed is to compare Vukovar of 1991 with Knin of 1995 and the difference will be clearly seen between those who were destroying everything in their path and those who were liberating their own, making sure that the damage was as minimal as possible and carrying out a professional military action. As any country where the law rules and not the people, the legal processes take time, they're not perfect, and sometimes they bring solutions that are not satisfactory to either the prosecutor or to those against whom the crime had been committed. The politics of our country did not incite to crimes, on the contrary it forbade them. If we look into the criminal court, the ICTY, even the Trial process in the case of our Generals confirmed that the politics of our country did not incite to crimes. I would say to my colleagues in Belgrade that we should, of course, move towards the future but, nevertheless, my colleagues in Belgrade still need to know and understand that we will never accept the equating of responsibility for war crimes nor will we ascribe the responsibility for those to the previous government of Greece because they, and I emphasize, are the responsibility of the individuals who committed them. Irrefutable facts show that Croatia suffered enormous material damage and what's most sad there are the losses of civilian and military lives. Comparing the number of those accused and those convicted so far from all nationalities at the international court, the ICTY, and bear show evidence that there is no legal or moral basis to the equating of responsibility ".
 |
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar